Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Curr Pediatr Rep ; 9(4): 93-103, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1679471

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We provide the readers with a review of cardiac complications in children with multi-system inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and its short-term outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent reports described the acute cardiac manifestations of MIS-C in children and provided a glimpse of the short-term outcomes. SUMMARY: Children with MIS-C have been reported to acutely have variable degrees of cardiac findings including abnormal cardiac enzymes, abnormal electrocardiographs, decreased systolic function, coronary artery abnormalities from coronary dilation to giant aneurysms, mitral valve regurgitation, tricuspid valve regurgitation, aortic valve insufficiency, pericardial effusion, diastolic dysfunction, abnormal cardiac strain, and abnormal cardiac MRI. The majority of these abnormalities resolved during short-term follow-up. Further studies are needed to assess if transient or persistent cardiac complications are associated with long-term adverse cardiac events in children with MIS-C. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40124-021-00258-5.

2.
Ann Transl Med ; 9(23): 1712, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1538973

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Delta variant of concern (VOC)-contaminated environmental surfaces and air in hospital wards admitting COVID-19 cases. Our study was designed to identify high-risk areas of Delta VOC contamination in the hospital and provide suggestions to in-hospital infection control. We analyzed the SARS-CoV-2 Delta VOC contamination in the air and environmental surface samples collected from a hospital in Nanjing, China. METHODS: We collected data on clinical features, laboratory tests, swab tests, and hospital wards, identified the factors associated with environmental contamination, and analyzed patients' hygiene behaviors during hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 283 environmental surface and air samples were collected from a hospital admitting 36 COVID-19 patients. Twelve swab samples from ten patients were positive. Toilet seats had the highest contamination rate (11.8%), followed by bedside tables (8.2%), garbage bins (5.9%), and bedrails (1.6%). The median time of symptom onset to surface sampling was shorter in the positive environment group than in the negative environment group (11 vs. 18 days; P=0.001). The results indicated that environmental surface contamination was associated with positive anal swabs [odds ratio (OR) 27.183; 95% CI: 2.359-226.063; P=0.003] and the time from symptom onset to surface sampling (OR 0.801; 95% CI: 0.501-0.990; P=0.046). The survey revealed that 33.3% of the patients never cleaned or disinfected their bedside tables or toilets, and 8.3% of them only cleaned their bedside tables or toilets. More than half of the patients often (25%) or always (30.6%) put the used masks on their bedside tables. Only 16.7% of the patients threw the masks into the specific garbage bin for used masks. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 Delta VOC was detected on environmental surfaces, especially toilet seats and bedside tables, within a median time of 11 days after symptom onset. Our study provided potential predictors for environmental surface contamination, including positive anal swabs and the time from symptom onset to sampling. Disinfecting high-risk environmental surfaces should be emphasized in hospital wards, especially for patients in the early stage of COVID-19.

3.
Ann Transl Med ; 8(14): 878, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-721676

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic. To date, although many studies have reported on the computed tomography (CT) manifestations of COVID-19, the vascular enlargement sign (VES) of COVID-19 has not been deeply examined, with the few available studies reporting an inconsistent prevalence. We thus performed a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the best available studies to estimate the prevalence and identify the underlying differential diagnostic value of VES. METHODS: We searched nine English and Chinese language databases up to April 23, 2020. Studies that evaluated CT features of COVID-19 patients and reported VES, with or without comparison with other pneumonia were included. The methodologic quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Meta-analyses with random effects models were performed to calculate the aggregate prevalence and pooled odds ratios (ORs) of VES. We also conducted meta-regression and subgroup analyses to analyze heterogeneity. RESULTS: VES findings from a total of 1969 patients were summarized and pooled across 22 studies. Our analysis demonstrated that the prevalence of VES among COVID-19 patients was 69.37% [95% confidence interval (CI): 57.40-79.20%]. Compared with non-COVID-19 patients, VES manifestation was more frequently observed in confirmed COVID-19 patients (OR =6.43, 95% CI: 3.39-12.22). Studies that explicitly defined distribution of VES in the lesion area demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence (P=0.03). Subgroup analyses also revealed a relatively higher VES rate in studies with a sample size larger than 50, but the difference was not statistically significant. No significant difference in VES rates was found between different countries (China/Italy), regions (Hubei/outside Hubei), average age groups (over/less than 50-year-old), or slice thicknesses of CT scan. Extensive heterogeneity was identified across most estimates (I2>80%). Some of the variations (R2=19.73%) could be explained by VES distribution, and sample size. No significant publication bias was seen (P=0.29). CONCLUSIONS: VES on thoracic CT was found in almost two-thirds of COVID-19 patients, and was more prevalent compared with that of the non-COVID-19 patients, supporting a promising role for VES in identifying pneumonia caused by coronavirus.

4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(8): 1698.e1-1698.e4, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-625343

ABSTRACT

The clinical therapy for severe 2019 coronavirus disease (i.e., COVID-19) sufferers is relatively challenging. Herein, the processes involving salvage of a critical COVID-19 patient were retrospectively analyzed. The condition of an obese female critical COVID-19 sufferer progressively worsened in the initial period after admission. According to her symptoms and examination reports, endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation were timely conducted and meanwhile high-dose sedatives and analgesics were administrated. In the later therapeutic phase, however, sedative and analgesic dosages were gradually reduced, and psychological and rehabilitative therapies were conducted, concomitantly with enhancement of airway care to facilitate sputum expectoration. Eventually, the endotracheal tube was feasibly removed after intubation for 18 days and subsequently replaced with noninvasive ventilation and a high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. Intensive airway care alongside psychological and rehabilitative therapies can shorten the mechanical ventilation time and improve the prognosis of COVID-19 sufferers.


Subject(s)
Airway Management/methods , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Adult , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Critical Care , Female , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Intubation, Intratracheal , Noninvasive Ventilation , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
5.
Psychiatry Res ; 288: 112945, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-46892

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Insufficient housing quality is associated with stress and mental health impacts. Crowding, pollution, noise, inadequate lighting, lack of access to green spaces, and other environmental factors associated with slums can exacerbate mental health disorders, including depression, anxiety, violence, and other forms of social dysfunction. METHOD: The studies were identified using large-sized newspapers with international circulation. RESULTS: Experts say that people who sleep in shelters or on the streets already have lower life expectancy, suffer from addiction, and have underlying health conditions that put them at greater risk should they develop the virus. There are just so many competing and unmet needs, which makes it much harder for homeless to contend with all of this. If exposed, people experiencing homelessness might be more susceptible to illness or death due to the prevalence of underlying physical and mental medical conditions and a lack of reliable and affordable health care. Nevertheless, without an urgent solution, people experiencing homelessness will remain in limbo. CONCLUSIONS: Many people living on the streets already have a diminished health condition, higher rates of chronic illnesses or compromised immune systems, all of which are risk factors for developing a more serious manifestation of the coronavirus infection. Those suffering from mental illness may have difficulty in recognizing and responding to the threat of infection. Homeless people have less access to health care providers who could otherwise order diagnostic testing and, if confirmed, isolate them from others in coordination with local health departments.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Health Services Accessibility , Ill-Housed Persons , Mental Disorders , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Vulnerable Populations , Anxiety Disorders , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Female , Ill-Housed Persons/psychology , Housing , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Psychiatry Res ; 288: 112939, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-46479

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Homeless experts and some federal housing officials are sounding the alarm that the patchwork of government efforts to address the coronavirus outbreak risks leaving out one group of acutely vulnerable people: the homeless. In terms of isolation, it is too unclear what that looks like if you normally sleep on the streets. In this tough moment, when people should be turned away, not only it feels inhumane, but it is also a big public health risk, because where are they going to go? METHOD: The studies were identified using large-sized newspapers with international circulation RESULTS: With more cities suspecting community transmission of the novel coronavirus, people who sleep in shelters or hunker down outside already have a lower life expectancy and often have underlying health conditions that put them at greater risk if they develop COVID-19 (Global News, 2020). These people face lack of sleep, malnutrition, and "extreme stress levels just to meet their daily needs", all of which weakens the immune system. Along with mental illness or substance abuse disorders, they are "incredibly vulnerable to this virus". CONCLUSIONS: Health organizations are well aware of the risks involved in mental health. A large population of homeless people experience their pain and psychological distress intermittently. For low-income patients, the various borderline situations related to health/illness involve growing expectations regarding the basic needs. This is a serious concern when linked to the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Ill-Housed Persons , Mental Disorders , Mental Health , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Adult , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Community Psychiatry , Coronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Female , Ill-Housed Persons/psychology , Humans , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Isolation , Stress, Psychological
7.
Infect Genet Evol ; 82: 104285, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-6174

ABSTRACT

The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. However, so far, there are still controversies about the source of the virus and its intermediate host. Here, we found the novel coronavirus was closely related to coronaviruses derived from five wild animals, including Paguma larvata, Paradoxurus hermaphroditus, Civet, Aselliscus stoliczkanus and Rhinolophus sinicus, and was in the same branch of the phylogenetic tree. However, genome and ORF1a homology show that the virus is not the same coronavirus as the coronavirus derived from these five animals, whereas the virus has the highest homology with Bat coronavirus isolate RaTG13.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/genetics , Coronavirus/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Animals , Betacoronavirus/classification , Chiroptera/virology , Coronavirus/classification , Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Mammals/classification , Mammals/virology , Mutation , Phylogeny , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL